Freedom of speech

A place for serious discussion on any non-religious topic
Forum rules
A place for serious discussion on any non-religious topic

Freedom of speech

Postby gone » November 2nd, 2017, 10:35 am

I am of the opinion freedom of speech is ok unless it verbally abuses innocent people in an unpleasant way. For instance, those who make racist and anti-gay remarks. Would those who claim they should be able to speak freely support the right of paedophiles state they have the right to have sex with children? I remember a member of the now banned Paedophile information Exchange stating just that on a BBC radio programme in the early 80s. :shock:
gone
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: September 28th, 2009, 1:17 pm

Re: Freedom of speech

Postby Sprocket » November 2nd, 2017, 10:42 am

As long as all they're allowed to do is express that opinion, not act on it, yes. Freedom of speech doesn't mean "Freedom to agree with me".
Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.
Sir John Harington (1561-1620)
User avatar
Sprocket
 
Posts: 15952
Joined: October 25th, 2007, 11:21 am
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Herts.

Re: Freedom of speech

Postby gone » November 2nd, 2017, 11:31 am

Hmmmmmmmmmm! :shock:
gone
 
Posts: 1243
Joined: September 28th, 2009, 1:17 pm

Re: Freedom of speech

Postby Pondero » November 2nd, 2017, 3:06 pm

Freedom of speech does not give you the right to shout fire (when there isn't one) in a crowded theatre.
We live at a time ...characterized by a subliminal relativism that penetrates every area of life. Sometimes this relativism becomes aggressive, when it opposes those who say that they know where the truth or meaning of life is to be found. Benedict XV1.
User avatar
Pondero
 
Posts: 12541
Joined: October 25th, 2007, 11:03 am
Location: Etobicoke,Ontario, Canada


Return to General discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests